Re: New Object Access Type hooks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date
Msg-id 15e21fc0-a23b-bd8d-d71c-2cf326c97971@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/22/22 12:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On Mar 22, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> As a quick-n-dirty fix to avoid reverting the entire test module,
>>> perhaps just delete this error check for now.
>> Ok, done as you suggest:
> I only suggested removing the error check in _PG_init, not
> changing the way the test works.
>
>             



Mark and I discussed this offline, and decided there was no requirement
for the module to be preloaded. Do you have a different opinion?


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks