Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Konstantin Knizhnik
Subject Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 15c655f7-c03e-6eb5-6e75-0776fae7d4f5@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 02.11.2019 10:19, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 6:31 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pá 1. 11. 2019 v 17:09 odesílatel Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> napsal:
>>> On 01.11.2019 18:26, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:15 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
>>>> <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>>>>> It seems to me that I have found quite elegant solution for per-backend statistic for GTT: I just inserting it in
backend'scatalog cache, but not in pg_statistic table itself.
 
>>>>> To do it I have to add InsertSysCache/InsertCatCache functions which insert pinned entry in the correspondent
cache.
>>>>> I wonder if there are some pitfalls of such approach?
>>>> That sounds pretty hackish. You'd have to be very careful, for
>>>> example, that if the tables were dropped or re-analyzed, all of the
>>>> old entries got removed --
>>> I have checked it:
>>> - when table is reanalyzed, then cache entries are replaced.
>>> - when table is dropped, then cache entries are removed.
>>>
>>>> and then it would still fail if any code
>>>> tried to access the statistics directly from the table, rather than
>>>> via the caches. My assumption is that the statistics ought to be
>>>> stored in some backend-private data structure designed for that
>>>> purpose, and that the code that needs the data should be taught to
>>>> look for it there when the table is a GTT.
>>> Yes, if you do "select * from pg_statistic" then you will not see
>>> statistic for GTT in this case.
>>> But I do not think that it is so critical. I do not believe that anybody
>>> is trying to manually interpret values in this table.
>>> And optimizer is retrieving statistic through sys-cache mechanism and so
>>> is able to build correct plan in this case.
>>
>> Years ago, when I though about it, I wrote patch with similar design. It's working, but surely it's ugly.
>>
>> I have another idea. Can be pg_statistics view instead a table?
>>
>> Some like
>>
>> SELECT * FROM pg_catalog.pg_statistics_rel
>> UNION ALL
>> SELECT * FROM pg_catalog.pg_statistics_gtt();
>>
>> Internally - when stat cache is filled, then there can be used pg_statistics_rel and pg_statistics_gtt() directly.
WhatI remember, there was not possibility to work with queries, only with just relations.
 
> It'd be a loss if you lose the ability to see the statistics, as there
> are valid use cases where you need to see the stats, eg. understanding
> why you don't get the plan you wanted.  There's also at least one
> extension [1] that allows you to backup and use restored statistics,
> so there are definitely people interested in it.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/ossc-db/pg_dbms_stats
It seems to have completely no sense to backup and restore statistic for 
temporary tables which life time is limited to life time of backend,
doesn't it?





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: On disable_cost
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables