Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id 15924.1529597329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> We could do without the unrelated whitespace changes in dumpDefaultACL,
> too (or did pgindent introduce those?  Seems surprising ... oh, looks
> like "type" has somehow snuck into typedefs.list.  Time for another
> blacklist entry.)

Hmm .. actually, "type" already is in pgindent's blacklist.  Are you
using an up-to-date pgindent'ing setup?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade