Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey Borodin
Subject Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools
Date
Msg-id 1591B71B-3BC7-4F1F-BFAF-69C51E144299@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools
List pgsql-hackers

> On 14 May 2025, at 05:33, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It might not necessarily be a flag—it could be some LSN value instead.
>> Also, it's not just about a "new transaction," but about any new
>> snapshot that could see data not yet replicated to the synchronous
>> standby.
>>
>
> Sounds reasonable to me. Let us see what others think about it.

I think this LSN is simply LSN where crash recovery ends...


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert failure in base_yyparse
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 18 Beta 1 io_max_concurrency