Re: pgsql: Resolve timing issue with logging locks for Hot Standby. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql: Resolve timing issue with logging locks for Hot Standby.
Date
Msg-id 15910.1327941501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Resolve timing issue with logging locks for Hot Standby.  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Resolve timing issue with logging locks for Hot Standby.  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-committers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 01/30/2012 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another aspect of this is that when the same-or-almost-the-same patch
>> is applied to multiple branches, it's a *lot* easier for future
>> archeology in the commit logs if the patch goes into all the affected
>> branches at the same time (and with the same commit message, please).

> Yeah, I've been pinged on this before, for exactly this reason. It makes
> release note preparation significantly easier, AIUI.

Not just release notes, but routine questions like "when was this bug
fixed, and in which branches?".  I keep a regularly-updated copy of
the output of src/tools/git_changelog (before git we used cvs2cl
to get similar output from CVS).  It's a rare day that I don't have
some occasion to consult it.  I don't appreciate committers randomly
cluttering that log by making commits that the tool doesn't know how
to merge.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Resolve timing issue with logging locks for Hot Standby.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Remove prototype for nonexistent function.