Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id 1590310.1675379449@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> It's still important to have libc support as an option, though,
> because it's a totally reasonable thing to want sort order to agree
> with the "sort" command on the same host, and you are willing to deal
> with all the complexities that we're trying to escape.

Yeah.  I would be resistant to making ICU a required dependency,
but it doesn't seem unreasonable to start moving towards it being
our default collation support.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove unused code related to iso-8859-1 type