Re: WAL and pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WAL and pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 15885.1135312837@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL and pg_dump  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: WAL and pg_dump  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-admin
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> As I recall, the initial backup of our 360GB (or so) database took
> about 6 hours and the restore only took about 2 hours.

Really?  I'd certainly have guessed the opposite (mainly because of
index build time, constraint checking, etc during reload).  Could it
be that compression of the pg_dump output is swamping all else during
the backup phase?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgstat.tmp file activity
Next
From: "sandhya"
Date:
Subject: Re: lo_ functions