Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions
Date
Msg-id 15879.938122950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Progress report: buffer refcount bugs and SQL functions  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     Shouldn't a function returning a SET of tuples cause a proper
>     join?

Join on what?  The semantics suggested by the existing regress tests
(for lack of any actual documentation :-() certainly appear to be
straight Cartesian product.

Anyway, I have no intention of spending more time on this feature now.
There's lots of higher-priority problems...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] VIEW definitions broken in 6.5.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha