Re: GetNewObjectId question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: GetNewObjectId question
Date
Msg-id 1587178.1670739154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GetNewObjectId question  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 07:11:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, that looks like somebody didn't read the memo.
>> Want to submit a patch?

> The comment has been added in e3ce2de but the call originates from
> 6566133, so that's a HEAD-only issue.

Ah, good that the bug hasn't made it to a released version yet.
But that comment is *way* older than e3ce2de; it's been touched
a couple of times, but it dates to 721e53785 AFAICS.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ian Lawrence Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables