Re: Parallel query execution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Parallel query execution
Date
Msg-id 15816.1358320049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel query execution  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Re: Parallel query execution
CF Progress or the lack thereof
Re: Parallel query execution
Re: Parallel query execution
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> There are still 34 items needing attention in CF3.  I suggest that, if
> you have some spare time, your help would be very much appreciated
> there.  The commitfest that started on Jan 15th has 65 extra items.
> Anything currently listed in CF3 can rightfully be considered to be part
> of CF4, too.

In case you hadn't noticed, we've totally lost control of the CF
process.  Quite aside from the lack of progress on closing CF3, major
hackers who should know better are submitting significant new feature
patches now, despite our agreement in Ottawa that nothing big would be
accepted after CF3.  At this point I'd bet against releasing 9.3 during
2013.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Next
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown