Re: Unicode upper() bug still present - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Date
Msg-id 15779.1066684541@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unicode upper() bug still present  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I agree that depending on the system-provided locale behavior has its
>> downsides, but it has its upsides too;

> I like to think that in the end we can do much better than the POSIX
> framework can do.

Sure, we can make it work exactly the way we want.  I'm just wondering
whether the benefits are worth the significant expenditure of effort...

But if you want to do the work, I won't hold you back.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum thoughts