-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Simon Riggs wrote:
> The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we
> own the code and it is of course BSD licenced.
As an aside, how can copyright be assigned to a non-defined
group (a concept really, as near as I can tell). Is the PGDG
actually defined anywhere yet? If not, anyone want to take
a stab at it?
IMHO, we need to get this resolved at some point - either have
the code owned by their respective contributors (e.g. Linux)
or by a legal entity (e.g. Apache Foundation). The former may
be what we actually have anyway.
Copying to advocacy as someone there may have the answer.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200711081016
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFHMyqrvJuQZxSWSsgRAw0hAJ9DD2gwr4nlmeoPNPeifXTloWip6ACgwv9z
WQTV1ccmRQ0EBbomxQUxeak=
=zng7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
