Heikki,
> The problem goes away after some time, after the 1st standby has
> streamed the contents of 000000020000000000000003 and written it to
> disk, and the cascaded standby reconnects. But it would be nice to
> avoid
> that situation. I'm not sure how to do that yet, we might need to
> track
> the timeline we're currently receiving/sending more carefully. Or
> perhaps we need to copy the previous WAL segment to the new name when
> switching recovery target timeline, like we do when a server is
> promoted. I'll try to come up with something...
Would it be accurate to say that this issue only happens when all of the replicated servers have no traffic?
--Josh
