Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Date
Msg-id 15737.1162746114@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Perhaps you could edit the above if needed?

>         <---- Xids older than freeze_distance will be frozen whenever
>               next visited by VACUUM, but there is no forcing function
>               until they exceed freeze_limit

>> In that case,
>> maybe slightly more differentiated names would be appropriate.

> Got a suggestion?  I think the names *should* be clearly related, but
> as I said, I'm by no means wedded to these particular ones.

After re-reading the above, it strikes me that maybe names based around
"freeze_min" and "freeze_max" would be useful?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug in WAL backup documentation