Re: Using Cursor in PostgreSQL 7.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Using Cursor in PostgreSQL 7.2
Date
Msg-id 1560.1008028385@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using Cursor in PostgreSQL 7.2  (Joe Conway <joseph.conway@home.com>)
List pgsql-general
Joe Conway <joseph.conway@home.com> writes:
> It looks like the stats monitoring functions suffer from the same
> limitation that I hit with dblink:

I've added the missing checks in the planner; possibly you could get rid
of that UNION hack now.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: What can I use as a [non-aggregate] minimum function
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: idle in transaction