Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU
Date
Msg-id 15587.1124719931@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU  (Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>)
Responses Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU  (Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> writes:
> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>> How is FreeBSD's Unicode support broken?  I was not aware of that.

> FreeBSD has no unicode collation support. Hence the need for ICU.

Well, this obviously doesn't bother anyone who uses FreeBSD, so it need
not bother us either.  I do not feel a need to take on ICU in order to
implement features that are not present anywhere else on the platform.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Sleep functions
Next
From: Palle Girgensohn
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU