Re: make everything target - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: make everything target
Date
Msg-id 15550.1264631917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: make everything target  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: make everything target  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Re: make everything target  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html + 
>> contrib".

> +10

>> And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run 
>> installcheck for src, pl and contrib.

> +100

These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an
appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention?

I assume we don't want to mess with the default behavior (I don't
want to, anyway).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: C function accepting/returning cstring vs. text