Re: Missing docs on AT TIME ZONE precedence? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Missing docs on AT TIME ZONE precedence?
Date
Msg-id 155486.1701196478@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing docs on AT TIME ZONE precedence?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2023-11-28 Tu 10:27, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK.  How about rewriting that first para like this?

> LGTM. Thanks.

Thanks for reviewing.  While checking things over one more time,
I noticed that there was an additional violation of this precept,
dating back to long before we understood the hazards: SET is
given its own priority, when it could perfectly well share that
of IDENT.  I adjusted that and pushed.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Properly pathify the union planner