Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Date
Msg-id 15541.1458848823@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> That's fair. I didn't really imagine that we'd want to put the tool
> into 9.5 myself. Still, I think that amcheck could have some role to
> play in managing the problem. Even the near-term availability of
> amcheck for 9.5 as a satellite project would count. That could happen
> without blocking the point release. I just don't want to go over
> anyone's head with that.

I have no objection to something like that happening.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)