Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From legrand legrand
Subject Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Date
Msg-id 1553718968249-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)  (legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
List pgsql-hackers
>>     - trailing whitespaces and comments wider than 80 characters
>>          not fixed

> why?  In case it's not clear, I'm talking about the .c file, not the
> regression tests.

I work on a poor msys install on windows 7, where perl is broken ;o(
So no pgindent available. 
Will fix that later, or as soon as I get a pgindent diff.

>>     - "Assert(planning_time > 0 && total_time > 0);"
>>          moved at the beginning of pgss_store

> Have you tried to actually compile postgres and pg_stat_statements
> with --enable-cassert?  This test can *never* be true, since you
> either provide the planning time or the execution time or neither.  As
> I said in my previous mail, adding a parameter to say which counter
> you're updating, instead of adding another counter that's mutually
> exclusive with the other would make everything clearer.

Yes this "assert" is useless as is ... I'll remove it.
I understand you proposal of pgss_store refactoring, but I don't have 
much time available now ... and I would like to check that performances 
are not broken before any other modification ...

Regards
PAscal








--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Next
From: Ants Aasma
Date:
Subject: Re: Enable data checksums by default