Julien Rouhaud wrote
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:30 PM legrand legrand
> <
> legrand_legrand@
> > wrote:
>>
>> maybe this patch (with a GUC)
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/
> 55E51C48.1060102@
>> would be enough for thoses actually using a text normalization function.
>
> The rest of thread raise quite a lot of concerns about the semantics,
> the cost and the correctness of this patch. After 5 minutes checking,
> it wouldn't suits your need if you use custom functions, custom types,
> custom operators (say using intarray extension) or if your tables
> don't have columns in the same order in every environment. And there
> are probably other caveats that I didn't see;
Yes I know,
It would have to be extended at less at functions, types, operators ...
names
and a guc pg_stat_statements.queryid_based= 'names' (default being 'oids')
and with a second guc ('fullyqualifed' ?)
sould include tables, functions, types, operators ... namespaces
let "users" specify their needs, we will see ;o)
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
