Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Looks like the behavior is still the same (except now it says
>> NOTICE: Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table pg_language
>> as well). I'm inclined to say we should change it, and am willing
>> to do the work if no one objects...
> Which part, the expansion of * or the warning code?
Changing expansion of * to include the implicit FROM clause entries
was what I was thinking of. However, given that we have the NOTICE,
maybe it's not necessary to do it. Let's leave the code as it is
for now and see what people think of it in actual use.
regards, tom lane
