> On 4 Sep 2024, at 03:25, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I see your v17 typo fixes, and raise you a few more. Commit 31a98934d169 from
>> just now contains 2 (out of 3) sets of typos introduced in v17 so they should
>> follow along when you push the ones mentioned here.
>
> Is that really mandatory? I tend to worry about back branches only
> when this stuff is user-visible, like in the docs or error messages.
> This opinion varies for each individual, of course. That's just my
> lazy opinion.
Not mandatory at all, but since you were prepping a typo backpatch anyways I
figured these could join to put a small dent in reducing risks for future
backports.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
