Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From rajan
Subject Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?
Date
Msg-id 1546490874712-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?  (Shreeyansh Dba <shreeyansh2014@gmail.com>)
Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-admin
Ok. Let me explain my use case from where I am asking this question,

For configuring Postgres Monitoring using a tool,
Is it enough if I just add the Postmaster process alone for Monitoring? or
Should I add all background processes for Monitoring?



-----
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utility process may go down?
Next
From: Shreeyansh Dba
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background/Utilityprocess may go down?