Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used
Date
Msg-id 15453.1496324935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> when using
> $ cat ~/.proverc
> -j9
> some tests fail for me in 9.4 and 9.5.

Weren't there fixes specifically intended to make that safe, awhile ago?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle