Re: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3
Date
Msg-id 15437.1508942075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3  (Stefan Tzeggai <tzeggai@empirica-systeme.de>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3  (Stefan Tzeggai <tzeggai@empirica-systeme.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
Stefan Tzeggai <tzeggai@empirica-systeme.de> writes:
> I can reproduce a segfault by executing a query.

That sounds like a bug, all right, but you've not provided enough
detail for anyone else to reproduce it.  A self-contained test
case would be the best thing.

If you can't provide that, it's possible that a stack trace from
the core dump would be enough info to diagnose the problem, but
no promises ...

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Generating_a_stack_trace_of_a_PostgreSQL_backend
        regards, tom lane


--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Tzeggai
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] Segfault 11 on PG10 with max_parallel_workers_per_gather>3
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC callsvery much