Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser, - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date
Msg-id 15413.1111619092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,  (Roy Badami <roy@gnomon.org.uk>)
Responses Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Roy Badami <roy@gnomon.org.uk> writes:
>     Tom> We should do that *only* when an ISO (not ANSI)
> Just to clarify, is that a distinction or just a clarification?  (ie
> are ANSI and ISO SQL different?)

There is no "ANSI SQL".  Only ISO SQL.  ANSI never issued their own
spec to my knowledge ... unlike, say, C, where I believe ANSI C was
in fact issued by ANSI.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month