Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
Date
Msg-id 153766.1593294377@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 06:25:21PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Personally, the dynamic link does not hurt the GPL.
>> But some people, do not think so, it was also unclear what Mr Stallman thinks
>> of the subject (dynamic link).

> I think Stallman says the courts have to decide, which kind of makes
> sense.

This subject (openssl vs readline) has been discussed to death in the
past, with varying opinions --- for example, Red Hat's well-qualified
lawyers think building PG with openssl + readline poses no problem,
Debian's lawyers apparently think otherwise.  Please see the archives
before re-opening the topic.  And, if you're not a lawyer, it's quite
unlikely you'll bring any new insights.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support