Re: FK v.s unique indexes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From pinker
Subject Re: FK v.s unique indexes
Date
Msg-id 1530780873796-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FK v.s unique indexes  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
David Rowley-3 wrote
> I don't think there were any actual roadblocks, it was more of just
> not enough time in the cycle to make it work due to a few technical
> details that required extra effort to make work.
> 
> Alvaro managed to simplify the problem and allow foreign keys to be
> defined on partitioned tables and get that into PG11.
> 
> So it was a case of 50% is better than 0%, which I very agree with.

That's a really great news. I was waiting for this feature for many years.
Finally! Thank you guys!



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rob Sargent
Date:
Subject: Re: FK v.s unique indexes
Next
From: Rafia Sabih
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Aware