Re: /contrib/retep to gborg - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
Date
Msg-id 15292.1034998428@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to /contrib/retep to gborg  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: /contrib/retep to gborg  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I think we should move /contrib/retep to gborg.  It is 400k and isn't
> anywhere near our core functionality.  I will add to TODO:
>     Move /contrib/retep to gborg
> Can I move this during beta?  I don't think so.

Why not?

Feature addition during beta is frowned on, but I never heard anyone say
you couldn't remove features during beta.  (In fact that's a pretty
standard response to serious bugs, no?)

Whether retep *should* be moved is not something I feel qualified to
comment on, but I don't put any stock in an argument that it can't
be done simply because we're in beta.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autocommit vs TRUNCATE et al
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Design decision curiosity