Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Date
Msg-id 152683.1659830125@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> So what about strtof?  That's gotta be dead code too.  I gather we
> still need commit 72880ac1's HAVE_BUGGY_STRTOF.  From a cursory glance
> at MinGW's implementation, it still has the complained-about
> behaviour, if I've understood the complaint, and if I'm looking at the
> right C runtime[1].

Looks plausible from here.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: failing to build preproc.c on solaris with sun studio