Re: pg_stat_statements opening claim is potentially misleading - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From legrand legrand
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements opening claim is potentially misleading
Date
Msg-id 1526407637627-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_stat_statements opening claim is potentially misleading  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-docs
The same should be noted for auto_explain as described here
  
www.postgresql-archive.org/Statements-that-time-out-are-not-considered-here-td6006753.html

As you, I was quite confused that cancelled queries where not taken into
account,
I first consider total_time, and mean_time in a second step (so durations of
timeout statements doesn't seem a problem here to me).

Here is an other discussion that could be interesting:
www.postgresql-archive.org/pg-stat-statements-how-to-catch-non-successfully-finished-statements-td6018801.html

Regards
PAscal





--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-docs-f2165602.html


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Incorrect description of the WITH CHECK in the row security can leadto the security issue
Next
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: Missing documentation for FETCH FIRST in chapter 7.6