Re: autovacuum vs. createdb - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: autovacuum vs. createdb
Date
Msg-id 15252.1200441716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to autovacuum vs. createdb  (Ben <bench@silentmedia.com>)
Responses Re: autovacuum vs. createdb  (Ben <bench@silentmedia.com>)
List pgsql-general
Ben <bench@silentmedia.com> writes:
> I'm noticing a problem where autovacuum touching template1 when createdb
> is run is making createdb fail. That's easy to work around when doing
> things by hand (just run it again), but when running createdb with a
> script, it's not so clear to me how to keep things working all the time.

There's a fix for this in 8.3, but in existing releases about all you
can do is make your script wait a few seconds and retry.

> One thought I had was having my script insert rows into pg_autovacuum
> temporarily (I assume in template1) but I'm not sure what tables I need to
> tell the autovacuum daemon to keep away from.

That seems counterproductive: any churn you make in template1 will mean
that autovacuum actually has something to do there, which you don't
want.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Clodoaldo
Date:
Subject: Re: ATTN: Clodaldo was Performance problem. Could it be related to 8.3-beta4?
Next
From: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
Date:
Subject: advocacy: drupal and PostgreSQL