Re: GIN Index for low cardinality - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ravi Krishna
Subject Re: GIN Index for low cardinality
Date
Msg-id 1521513486.16082500.1540475758494@mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIN Index for low cardinality  (Олег Самойлов <splarv@ya.ru>)
List pgsql-general
>>Does it mean that GIN is a very good choice for low cardinality columns.  
>Not necessary. There is other index which also don’t keep column value in an every leaf. Hash, for instance. 

Well I asked about GIN's usefulness for low cardinality.  Good to know that Hash can also be considered.
BTW until recently wasn't Hash unsafe for production since it was not WAL logged.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Олег Самойлов
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN Index for low cardinality
Next
From: Pratik Parikh
Date:
Subject: Re: Compile and build portable postgresql for mac