Re: RULE regression test fragility? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RULE regression test fragility?
Date
Msg-id 15201.1382801239@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RULE regression test fragility?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: RULE regression test fragility?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> [ patch for \a\t mode in rules and sanity_check output ]

Committed with some minor adjustment of the comments.

>> +1 (but what are those silly parens in pg_seclabels definition?),

> That's because it contain several UNION ALLs and ruleutils makes sure
> the order is correct.

That looks weird to me too, but it's surely not the fault of this patch.
Maybe we should take a look at exactly what ruleutils is doing there.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Changes to stringinfo.c
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: RULE regression test fragility?