Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Date
Msg-id 1519501766.2510.13.camel@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
> Solution.pm has this:
> ...
> from which HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT seems to be suspiciously missing?

Right, but it is missing in pg_config.h, too, right? I have no personal
experience with the Windows build, so I cannot tell if it should be
defined.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT