Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery
Date
Msg-id 15190.1233070673@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> (replying to a very old message, since I just bumped into this in review)
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> The new message is not translatable, the original was.

> Doesn't really matter since it's an elog(), not ereport().

... which is wrong in itself, since it's certainly meant as a
user-facing (or at least DBA-facing) message.  elog should generally
only be used for debugging or "can't happen" messages, not for stuff
that users are expected to see on a routine basis.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: mingw check hung
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to add Windows 7 support