Re: Progress Report on Materialized Views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Progress Report on Materialized Views
Date
Msg-id 15156.1077585076@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Progress Report on Materialized Views  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> You are 100% right: MVs are unambiguously not allowed as part of the
> TPC-H spec - what 1.5.7 shows is how useful MVs are: they've had to ban
> them!

Ah, now I get your point.  You're quite right, the TPC-H queries taken
as a repetitive workload would be a good test case for materialized
views.  I misunderstood you as suggesting that we'd want to push use
of MVs into the DBT-3 benchmark as such.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Too-many-files errors on OS X
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: user defined function in CHECK constraint