Re: Non-superuser subscription owners - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Date
Msg-id 1514479.1641664638@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
List pgsql-hackers
... btw, I'd like to complain that this new test script consumes
a completely excessive amount of time.  On my fairly-new primary
workstation:

[12:48:00] t/027_nosuperuser.pl ............... ok    22146 ms ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  1.12 cusr  0.95 csys =  2.09
CPU)

The previously-slowest script in the subscription suite is

[12:48:23] t/100_bugs.pl ...................... ok     7048 ms ( 0.00 usr  0.00 sys +  2.85 cusr  0.99 csys =  3.84
CPU)

and the majority of the scripts clock in at more like 2 to 4 seconds.
So I don't think I'm out of line in saying that this test is consuming
an order of magnitude more time than is justified.  I do not wish to
see this much time added to every check-world run till kingdom come
for this one feature/issue.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option