Re: Plan for update ... where a is not distinct from b - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Plan for update ... where a is not distinct from b
Date
Msg-id 1511898504.2375.6.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Plan for update ... where a is not distinct from b  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
Responses Re: Plan for update ... where a is not distinct from b  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
List pgsql-general
Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> I noticed that an update was taking a long time and found this:
> 
> UPDATE public.facttable_imf_ifs p
> SET [...lots of columns...]
> FROM cleansing.cls_imf_ifs_facttable_imf_ifs c, cleansing.cleansing_change_type ct
> WHERE
>     (p.macrobondtimeseries is not distinct from c.macrobondtimeseries) AND (p.date is not distinct from c.date)
>     AND c.cleansing_change_type_id = ct.cleansing_change_type_id
>     AND ct.cleansing_change_type_desc_short IN ('UPDATED_NEW')

It is kind of ugly, and I didn't test it, but here is an idea:

Suppose we know a value that cannot occur in both p.date and c.date.

Then you could write
  WHERE coalesce(p.date, '0044-03-15 BC') = coalesce(c.date, '0044-03-15 BC')

and create an index on the coalesce expressions to facilitate
a merge join.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Rakesh Kumar"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] - Regarding Schema ROLLBACK
Next
From: Robert Gordon
Date:
Subject: Where to troubleshoot phpPgAdmin login issues?