Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 09/27/2014 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So my vote is for a separate function and no optional arguments.
> You mean like row_to_json_no_nulls() and json_agg_no_nulls()?
I thought you were proposing that we should revert the committed patch
lock-stock-n-barrel, and instead invent json_strip_null_fields().
That's instead, not in addition to. Even if you weren't saying that
exactly, that's where my vote goes.
regards, tom lane