Tom Lane wrote:
>> But types also have the USAGE privilege for PUBLIC by default:
>
> Yup, that's an oversight.
>
>> Hence I propose the attached documentation patch.
>
> Pushed, with a bit of additional wordsmithing.
Thanks for taking the time.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers