Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ?? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ??
Date
Msg-id 15065.1036268249@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ??  (Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>)
Responses Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ??  (Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org> writes:
> howe=# select p.oid, n.nspname, pg_get_userbyid(p.proowner), proname
> from pg_proc as p, pg_namespace as n where pg_table_is_visible(p.oid);

> However, this situation lead me into another issue. The new conversion
> functions (utf8_to_big5, iso_to_alt, etc.) appear as listed in every
> new scheme. Is this correct ? Shouldn't them be listed only in
> pg_catalog? 

They would be, if you had remembered the join condition ;-)
where ... and p.pronamespace = n.oid
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ??
Next
From: Tommi Mäkitalo
Date:
Subject: missing const it PQexscapeBytea/PQunescapeBytea in 7.3b3