Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest
Date
Msg-id 1505611.1591373962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: minor doc fix - garbage in example of result of unnest  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> That's not "garbage", I put it there intentionally.

> I don't see where having the row counts in the output adds clarity and it
> just more text for the reader to mentally filter out.

Seems like I'm getting outvoted here.  If there aren't other votes,
I'll change it.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: valgrind error
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: significant slowdown of HashAggregate between 9.6 and 10