Re: LIMIT NULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: LIMIT NULL
Date
Msg-id 1502.1233607422@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LIMIT NULL  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Responses Re: LIMIT NULL
List pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's worked the way it does now since 7.1, and no one has complained;
>> in fact we've gotten bug reports when it was broken by the int8-limit
>> patch.  So there are people depending on the behavior.

> Yeah, it's very useful. Here's a patch for the docs about it.

Seems to me that the SELECT reference page is a more appropriate place
for this type of detail.  I've applied a patch there.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: LIMIT NULL