Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw cost estimation defaults and documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Finnerty
Subject Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw cost estimation defaults and documentation
Date
Msg-id 1496798660063-5965199.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw cost estimation defaults and documentation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw cost estimation defaults and documentation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
In some MPP systems, networking costs are modeled separately from I/O costs,
processor costs, or memory access costs.  I think this is what Ashutosh may
have been getting at with /per-packet/ costs:  in a more sophisticated fdw
cost model there could be a  network cost per /packet/ that would be
independent of the cost of reading the next page or a random page from local
storage.



--
View this message in context:
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/postgres-fdw-cost-estimation-defaults-and-documentation-tp5964861p5965199.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers