Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date
Msg-id 14962.1247409296@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/7/12 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> If we're going to go for reentrancy
>> I think we should fix both components.

> when we don't use reentrant grammar, then we cannot use main sql parser in SQL?

It wouldn't be a problem for the immediate application I have in mind,
which is to re-use the core lexer in plpgsql.  But it does seem like
it might be a problem down the road as plpgsql gets smarter.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: *_collapse_limit, geqo_threshold