Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Date
Msg-id 1493882731645-5959615.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
List pgsql-hackers
> 1) we switch unmarked CTEs as inlineable by default in pg11. 

+1 from me for option 1




--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/CTE-inlining-tp5958992p5959615.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)