Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Date
Msg-id 1493740874227-5959313.post@n3.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Relevant posts where users get confused by our behaviour:
> ....

And Markus Winand's blog: http://modern-sql.com/feature/with/performance
   Databases generally obey this principle, although PostgreSQL represents
a big exception 

and 
   Besides PostgreSQL, all tested databases optimize with clauses in the
same way    that they optimize views or derived tables"






--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/CTE-inlining-tp5958992p5959313.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION,query cancellations and slot handling)
Next
From: Rahila Syed
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning