Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oleg Golovanov
Subject [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Date
Msg-id 1492077894.580993208@f377.i.mail.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi.

I got errors of patching on CentOS 7:

bash-4.2$ grep Hunk *.log | grep FAILED
0005-hj-leader-gate-v11.patch.log:Hunk #1 FAILED at 14.
0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.log:Hunk #2 FAILED at 2850.
0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.log:Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.log:Hunk #3 FAILED at 622.
0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.log:Hunk #6 FAILED at 687.
0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.log:Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.log:Hunk #3 FAILED at 153.What is wrong? The sources were clean:


bash-4.2$ git status
# On branch master
nothing to commit, working directory clean

I was patching by the command:

patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0001-hj-refactor-memory-accounting-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0001-hj-refactor-memory-accounting-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0002-hj-refactor-batch-increases-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0002-hj-refactor-batch-increases-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0003-hj-refactor-unmatched-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0003-hj-refactor-unmatched-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0004-hj-barrier-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0004-hj-barrier-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0005-hj-leader-gate-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0005-hj-leader-gate-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0006-hj-let-node-have-seg-in-worker-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0006-hj-let-node-have-seg-in-worker-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0007-hj-remove-buf-file-is-temp-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0007-hj-remove-buf-file-is-temp-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0008-hj-buf-file-set-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0008-hj-buf-file-set-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0009-hj-shared-tuplestore-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0009-hj-shared-tuplestore-v11.patch.log
patch -b -i ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch -p1 --verbose > ../.patches/parallel-shared-hash-v11/0010-hj-parallel-v11.patch.logBest Regards,

Oleg Golovanov
Moscow, Russia

Вторник, 4 апреля 2017, 0:28 +03:00 от Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>:

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-03-31 17:53:12 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Thanks very much to Rafia for testing, and to Andres for his copious
>> review feedback. Here's a new version. Changes:
>
> I unfortunately think it's too late to get this into v10. There's still
> heavy development going on, several pieces changed quite noticeably
> since the start of the CF and there's still features missing. Hence I
> think this unfortunately has to be pushed - as much as I'd have liked to
> have this in 10.
>
> Do you agree?

Agreed.

Thank you very much Andres, Ashutosh, Peter, Rafia and Robert for all
the review, testing and discussion so far.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to control physical replication slot
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker